Alcohol Impact Areas a failing regulation model; is anyone surprised?

Central District News makes clear what most of us already knew:
[A]t the end of 2006 the area for the ban was enlarged to include Capitol Hill, the University District, and most of the CD (the map was carefully drawn to include every convenience store in our neighborhood). And now, 18 months later, we've got the first report on how it's working: hardly at all.

The ban was placed on specific brands of drinks such as Night Train and Colt 45, and so the businesses have just gone and rebranded the same drinks to avoid the ban. And the alcoholics, not caring too much about brand loyalty, have made the switch.
In the P.I. piece CDN links to, reporter Angela Galloway notes that city officials call the ban "doomed without reforms to deal with market changes"...

...so does that mean I can have my Strawberry Cisco again?
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.seattlecrimeblog.com/admin/trackback/69895
Comments (3) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
AFC - May 1, 2008 11:23 AM

I gets my Cisco when I wants it, orange!

Tazia - May 2, 2008 7:39 AM

"And the alcoholics, not caring too much about brand loyalty, have made the switch."

You are a real cynic.

Seattle Crime Blogger - May 2, 2008 10:01 AM

"You are a real cynic."

Haha, I'd take credit for that one if I could, but it's a quote from Central District News. They certainly deserve credit for it though.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.