Capitol Hill Neighborhood Safety Forum: my impressions

Just got back from the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Safety Forum over at Group Health, which lasted about an hour and a half. My impressions?

First of all, the event was pretty packed. I got there at about 5:45 p.m. and was shocked at how few folks were in attendance; but by 5:55, all the seats in the room - I'm guessing there were between 150-200 - were filling up. By 6:05 it was standing room only.

And the people in attendance weren't just my Capitol Hill neighbors. On the news media side, I spotted the ever-friendly Casey McNerthney from the P.I. Elisa Hahn from King 5 was there with a cameraman, and commented to me that since the Carnation murders, there's seemingly been a noticeable increase in local crime. I noted that the holidays must bring out the worst in us Northwesterners.

And the politicians: outgoing Seattle City Council president Nick Licata was on-hand, along with councilmembers Sally Clark and Tim Burgess (the latter of whom was sworn in just a few days ago). Police officers were out in full force as well. Lieutenant John Hayes, a well-known figure on Capitol Hill for at least as long as I've lived here, played a prominent role in the evening's discussion, and East Precinct Captain Paul McDonagh fielded a vast majority of community questions.

Even Mayor Greg Nickels was there, shaking attendees hands and thanking them for coming. I wasn't expecting his presence, but it was a pleasant surprise. People can criticize the mayor all they want, but it was a nice gesture of him to come out on a rainy night and show his support for Capitol Hill.

After some obligatory introductions and 30 seconds of silence, McDonagh gave a rundown of Harps' murder and the ongoing investigation surrounding it. While officials couldn't say much - as is often the case with details of an ongoing investigation - one thing appeared clear: they still don't know whether Harps knew her assailant or not.

"We need to get this person," said Nick Metz, an assistant chief with the SPD who oversees their Investigations Bureau. "We don’t know whether this person knew Shannon or didn’t know Shannon, and these are things that obviously create a great deal of fear in the community.”

Shortly after this rundown came the "Community Questions & Concerns" portion of the forum. I've never been to an event like this, so I can't say if this is the norm...but it appeared that a lot of folks took advantage of the opportunity and used it as a soapbox. I counted a total of 20 questions from community members, the vast majority of whom either asked about off-topic issues or didn't ask a question at all, using the time ramble about some other vaguely-related safety matter. One man even took the time to subtly blame fiscal conservatives for Harps' murder.

I understand that this forum was partially to help the community heal, and for that I can see why some used the Q & A as a chance to vent the emotions that have been building since Harps' death. But I went into the evening expecting more insightful discussion about the problems in our community and what the city of Seattle is doing to improve them. Complaining about perceived negative interactions with SPD in the past is doing everything but addressing the issues of the future (which I assumed was the focus going into this event).

Ultimately, I got the impression that a lot of these people expect SPD to put an end to all crime, immediately. Many seem unaware that they live in a neighborhood that I'll bet sits comfortably in the top 5% of safest urban communities in the world. Have we begun to take our incredibly high standard of living for granted?

One woman went so far as to claim that Capitol Hill is "beset" with crime, a claim that all personal experience and statistical data would disagree with. As Mayor Nickels noted at one point in the evening, Seattle's crime rate is at its lowest since 1968. Last year, while similar sized cities (D.C., Milwaukee & Boston) had between 66 and 181 homicides, Seattle had 24. Crime can't be eradicated completely...the idea that it can is a fallacy. But SPD has done a damn good job at keeping crime rates down, and thankfully a couple individuals used their chance on the microphone to note this.

Still, one legitimate concern of community members that came through loud and clear was their unified agreement on one issue: that in darkness, outdoor lighting on Capitol Hill sucks. While I can't say I agree with them, it's interesting that this is a concern shared by many locals. And judging by the reactions of SPD and representatives from the City Council, I have a feeling that lighting on the Hill - or the lack thereof - will be addressed in the very near future.

For a more detailed rundown of the overall event, check out the coverage over at Big City Hippie.
Trackbacks (1) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.seattlecrimeblog.com/admin/trackback/55401
Seattle Crime Blog - February 14, 2008 10:07 AM
It seems like in Seattle these days, community safety forums come a dime a dozen. First, there was the Capitol Hill Neighborhood Safety Forum, which we covered back in January. Then on Monday of this week, neighbors from the Central...
Comments (6) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Wesa - January 11, 2008 9:48 AM

A claim that all personal experience and statistical data would disagree with

This is a great response to the woman's speech. The way she put it...we practically live in New York City instead of "sleepy" Seattle. I wish that people would do a few minutes of research to back up their statements before speaking up at a public forum.

Concerned Father - January 22, 2008 9:02 PM

My daughter will be moving into an apartment building in the area of 19th and Highland in north Capital Hill next month. The landlord indicates that this area is safe and that I should not worry. Can anyone provide additional information as to the general safety of this area.

Seattle Crime Blogger - January 23, 2008 10:35 AM

Concerned Father:

I've walked through the area you're moving to many times and have always come away with the impression that the community around 19th & Highland is a sleepy, peaceful neighborhood. There seem to be a lot of families out there, and as it is further away from bustling areas like 15th Avenue, there is much less activity (both criminal and not). I'd argue that where you're moving is certainly one of the safest - and prettiest - areas of Capitol Hill.

jasonzrondeli - June 14, 2008 10:26 PM

Hello how are you doing :)

darvenginzks - July 31, 2008 12:55 AM

I've recently joined and wanted to introduce myself :)

Nearygererype - September 13, 2008 5:20 AM

Weight Loss Facts:

Low Fat Foods DON'T WORK.

You cannot lose weight using Low Fat Diets. Low fat foods have been popular for more than 15 years, but yet our society is getting more overweight as each year passes. This fact alone should tell you that eating a purely low fat menu is not the answer to losing weight.

Low Calorie Diets DON'T WORK.

You won't lose weight using a Low Calorie Dieting Plan either. In fact, eating low calories is the worst thing that you can do to your body, since that will only slow down your body's fat burning engine and ruin all chances of losing weight (low calorie diets may allow a few pounds of weight loss for the first few days, but then after that all weight loss comes to a halt --- known as a dieting plateau). You can never get slim by starving yourself.

Low Carb Plans DON'T WORK.

You'll probably find it extremely difficult to get slim using a Low Carb Dieting Plan. Low carb diets have recently become popular over the last couple years, but the problem with low carb menus is that they are too strict and TOO HARD TO FOLLOW for average people. Low carb menus tend to rob your body of too much energy (carbohydrates) and make it nearly impossible to remain on the program for very long. This is why so many dieters find it difficult to follow a strict low carbohydrate menu.

What about Weight Watchers and Jenny Craig Dieting Plans?

Weight loss programs such as Weight Watchers (and Jenny Craig) usually involve slower dieting progress over a longer period of time, since such programs generally promise only 2-3 pounds of weight loss per week. Also, programs such as Jenny Craig usually involve buying special meals and/or dietary supplements during the initial phases of the program. While some people may like these types of dietary programs, we prefer a dieting plan which focuses on faster weight loss, such as the Accelerated Fat Burning Program shown below...

Try our New ACCELERATED Fat Burning Diet right here

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.